Little regarding Charles Jaffe seems straightforward, and Jeremy Gaige’s excellent book Chess Personalia wisely left Jaffe’s birth-date as the vague ‘circa 1879’. As Gaige wrote on page 45 of an earlier work, A Catalog of U.S.A. Chess Personalia (Worcester, 1980):
‘But consider the case of Charles Jaffe: just when was he born?
- 1879 in Dubrovna, according Jaffe’s Chess Primer, page 5.
- 1883, according to Chess Review, March 1933, page 2.
- about 1876, in Dubrozno, according to his obituary in The New York Times of 12 July 1941, which said he died at age 65.
- about 1881, according to The Day and The Jewish Journal (both New York Yiddish newspapers), which said he died at age 60.
- 10 December 1887, in Dubrovno, according to the Biographical Dictionary of Modern Yiddish Literature, volume 4, columns 203-204.
- about 1878, according to the tournament book of Havana, 1913, which gave his age at that time as 35.’
On page 3 of the same booklet Gaige noted:
‘… the field of chess history comes well strewn with pitfalls – such as giving 1883 as the year for Charles Jaffe’s birth because Chess Review in 1933 picked up a report on a 50th birthday party for Charles Jaffee (a man with no relation to chess) and grafted that onto Charles Jaffe.’
C.N. 797 quoted a brief passage from Jaffe’s Chess Primer (New York, 1937), but a more detailed scrutiny of that spectacularly awful book is overdue.
It opened with an unsigned ‘Biography’, reproduced below with our comments in square brackets:
‘Charles Jaffe was born in Dubrovna, State of Mogilev on the Dneiper, Russia in 1879. While he attended the Russian and Hebrew schools, he displayed unmistakable signs of native chess talent.
At the age of 17 he came to America. He worked as a weaver in the silk mills of New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania until he reached the 31st year of his life. In 1910 he became prominent in chess circles both as a player and writer. At the First National American Chess Tournament in 1911 he shared third prize with Oscar Chajes, one-half point behind Capablanca [sic – Marshall won the tournament ahead of the Cuban]. In the same year he won the brilliancy prize [sic - one of 12 brilliancy prizes] and master title [sic – he finished joint bottom (equal 23rd)] at Carlsbaad [sic]. In 1913 at the Second National American Chess Tournament, he won the third prize defeating Capablanca, Janovski [sic], Chajes, Kupchik; but drawing with Marshall who was then US champion. In 1915 he won the New York State Championship [sic - Kupchik won]. He won matches against J. Ohrbach, champion of Paris [sic - presumably Arnold Aurbach - see La Stratégie, October 1911, page 372], Jacques Mieses, champion of Germany [sic], and Oscar Chajes, Western States champion. He has an even record against Jose Capablanca, winning two [sic] and losing two [sic]. In single games he has defeated such eminent players as Dr Emanuel Lasker, Frank J. Marshall, D. Janowski, J. Showalter and a host of others.
Charles Jaffe’s career has been both remarkable and tragic. At the very height of his fame his progress was intercepted by Jose Capablanca. At the Havana Tournament of 1913 Mr Capablanca stated to the press that since Jaffe had come to Cuba for the sole purpose of helping Marshall win, he would never again play in a tournament where Jaffe was entered as a contestant. It is certainly deplorable that Messrs Cassel and Helms, the American chess correspondents, not only believed these charges but also aided Capablanca by successfully keeping Jaffe out of all those American Tournaments in which they had influence. It might be noted that the great Dr Emanuel Lasker was driven from the US by very much the same tactics. He was barred from the New York Sextet Master Tournament of 1927.
Charles Jaffe’s knowledge of the game is unsurpassed by anyone. As an expert in the openings there is no one in the world who is his superior. In this field he has made many useful and ingenious contributions. The book is timely and necessary, for even the great masters will find new and unorthodox things of value.’
Havana, 1913. Anti-clockwise from bottom left: C. Jaffe, F.J. Marshall, O. Chajes, A. Kupchik, R. Blanco, L. Paredes, A. Ponce, E. Corzo, H. Cassel, S. Capablanca, J. Corzo, J.R. Capablanca, D. Janowsky.
The following page of Jaffe’s Chess Primer had a Foreword by Reshevsky. It too emphasized Jaffe’s alleged accomplishments:
‘Charles Jaffe remains today unquestionably one of the world’s leading authorities on openings. As a chess analyst there are few to equal him. He has met on an even footing and played with a marked measure of success against such players as Dr Emanuel Lasker, José Capablanca, Frank Marshall, Pillsbury and a host of other famous players.’ [Details are unavailable regarding Pillsbury, although C.N. 2791 gave the conclusion of a drawn simultaneous game between the two players.]
Then came an Introduction by Sigmund Miller which also sang Jaffe’s praises. To quote its conclusion:
‘In this book special consideration has been placed on the openings. A player who has not only mastered the openings but understands the direction and inherent value of these forms of play, is able, perforce, to play the middle and end games well. The logic of these openings are [sic] particularly stressed in such manner that the reader will follow the action logically and clearly. Advanced students will undoubtedly note that other moves than the accepted text moves are given. Since Charles Jaffe is considered the first expert on openings, these deviations should be given due consideration. These unorthodox moves have proven unquestionably superior to the others.
This book has a message for every chess player.’
By 1937 Jaffe was in his final phase, but even when at his peak he was, though unquestionably a strong player, hardly one of the world’s leading authorities on openings. In any case, Jaffe’s professed expertise on the openings did not shine through in the Primer itself. For example, page 22 had a list of ‘Guides for Openings’, ten points of less-than-perfect clarity such as the following:
‘5. Never strike from the center with your pawns, always to the center. The exception is only when you can protect the capturing pawn.’
Page 44 had the moves 1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 Bb5 Nf6, followed by the note ‘This move begins the Steinitz Defense’, while page 48 started a section on the Sicilian Defence:
‘This is a sister defense to the French. Black’s accomplishment in this defense is as little as in the other. At best Black can turn this into a King’s Fianchetto, but with a resulting weakness on the king’s side.’
That was followed by, in bold type, the ‘Sicilian Defense (Jaffe Variation)’: 1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 e6 3 d4 cxd4 4 Nxd4 Nf6. ‘This constitutes the Jaffe Variation, but, nevertheless, if White plays properly he has a good game.’ Jaffe neglected to mention that 4…Nf6 had been known for decades, having been played, for instance, several times by Anderssen in his 1861 match against Kolisch.
On page 51 the Queen’s Gambit Accepted was discarded in a few lines. 2…dxc4 received a question mark and one cursory, tumbledown sentence: ‘This is striking from the center inasmuch as he cannot hold this gain it is bad on general principles, as we shall see.’ Page 56 referred briefly to the ‘Queen’s Gambit-Declined Indian Defense’, which was Jaffe’s name for 1 d4 Nf6 2 c4 g6.
Most of the remainder of the book consisted of a chapter entitled ‘Ten Famous Games’, lightly annotated (‘… we will attempt to illustrate the finer and more complicated mechanism that composes the middle game with an eye towards the opening’.) The first was Edward Lasker’s spectacular miniature against Sir George Thomas (Dutch Defence; 11 Qxh7+), except that Jaffe made Lasker the loser, against Alekhine, affirming that it had been played ‘in the World’s Fair in Chicago with live figures. The combination in this game is so brilliant, so rare that it is difficult to believe that even a master could have worked it out in actual play.’
Game 3 was a Jaffe win over Paul Johner (‘Powell Jonner’), while Game 4 was Jaffe v Spielmann (also spelt ‘Spielman’), the introduction to which repeated the misleading remark that it won ‘the’ brilliancy prize at a tournament in Carlsbad (still ‘Carlsbaad’ in Jaffe’s spelling). Game 5 was a Jaffe win against Emanuel Lasker, which, he boasted, marked his debut ‘into the professional chess world’. It was an ‘off-hand game’ (from 1904) according to pages 116-117 of The Collected Games of Emanuel Lasker by K. Whyld, which had Black resigning after 44 Qd3, in contrast to the ‘32 Qd3 Resigns’ in Jaffe’s version.
In Game 6 Jaffe claimed to have won a miniature, as Black, against ‘Farne’ (i.e. Hans Fahrni) in a ‘Jaffe Defense’ played ‘in the Carlsbaad Tournament’:
1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 e6 3 d4 cxd4 4 Nxd4 Nf6 (‘This constitutes the
Jaffe Defense which leads to many exciting variations.’) 5 Nc3 Bb4
6 Bd3 e5 7 Nf5 O-O 8 Bg5 d5 9 exd5 e4 10 Bxe4 Re8 11 Ng3
11...Nxe4 12 Bxd8 Nxc3+ 13 Qe2 Nxe2+ 14 c3 Nxg3+ 15 Kd2 Nxh1 16 Rxh1 Rxd8 17 White resigns.
The three consecutive discovered checks are interesting, but the game is fiction. As shown on page 4 of part two of the Carlsbad, 1911 tournament book, the game went 9 exd5 Bxc3+ 10 bxc3 e4 11 Bxe4 Re8 12 Ng3 Nxe4 13 Bxd8 Nxc3+ 14 Kd2 Nxd1+ 15 Ba5 Nb2, and White eventually resigned after Black’s 45th move.
Game 7 could hardly be called famous:
1 d4 f5 2 e4 fxe4 3 c4 e6 4 Nc3 Nf6 5 Bg5 Bb4 6 f3 exf3 7 Nxf3 O-O 8 Bd3 b6 9 O-O Bxc3 10 bxc3 Bb7 11 Ne5 d6 12 Ng4 Nbd7 13 Qe1 Qe8 14 Qh4 Ne4 15 Be7 Rxf1+ 16 Rxf1 d5 17 Rf3 Qg6 18 Rg3 Qe8 19 cxd5 exd5 20 Bxe4 dxe4 21 Nh6+ Kh8 22 Rxg7 Kxg7 23 Nf5+ Kg8 24 Bf6 Kf7 25 Bg5 Kg6 26 g4 Kf7 27 Qxh7+ Ke6 28 Ng7+ Kd6 29 Bf4+ Resigns.
Jaffe stated that this was ‘between J. Bernstein and Dr H. Adair played at an International Tournament in N.Y.’, but we have yet to identify the occasion. There was a game between J. Bernstein and Dr G.F. Adair at the New York tournament in July-August 1913 (an event won by Capablanca ahead of Důras), but it ended in a draw.
Game 9 was a Marshall brilliancy against ‘Elfen’ Bogoljubow, while Game 10 was an Alekhine loss (the second match game against Euwe in 1935) in which, after 1 d4 Nf6 2 c4, Jaffe gave 2…g6 a question mark.
Jaffe’s Chess Primer, all 95 roomy pages of it, is seen mercifully seldom nowadays, and a publisher may be tempted to produce a reprint of what is, after all, a classic pageant of bumptiousness, incompetence and falsehood. The Primer would certainly fit in well with the chess list of Cardoza Publishing.
To the Chess Notes main page.
To the Archives for other feature articles.
Copyright: Edward Winter. All rights reserved.