When contacting us by e-mail, correspondents are asked to include their name and full postal address and, when providing information, to quote exact book and magazine sources. The word ‘chess’ needs to appear in the subject-line or in the message itself.
An addition to Gaffes by Chess Publishers and Authors has been submitted by Javier Asturiano Molina (Murcia, Spain):
This translation of Steiner’s well-known book was published in Madrid in 2004.
From page 337 of Inteligências em Confronto: Campeonatos Mundiais de Xadrez by Rubens Filguth (Porto Alegre, 2006):
This very tricky three-mover was shown in C.N. 11242. The solution given on page 290 of the July 1905 BCM was 1 Qa6, but a correction appeared on page 329 of the August 1905 issue:
Olivia Segura Ortiz (Mexico City) has sent us this photograph of a painting commissioned by her grandfather, Dr Alfredo Lejarza, to depict his fight for the life of a dangerously ill boy in a game of chess against Death. Our correspondent’s grandmother is calling on Death to stop and to allow the boy to live.
This information corrects what appeared on page 275 of the Whitsun 1963 CHESS, an item which is in our feature article Chess and Ghosts:
Eduardo Bauzá Mercére (New York, NY, USA) notes that the game discussed in C.N. 8576 was played in the eighth round of the Torneo Mayor in Buenos Aires on 17 July 1926. He provides this cutting from page 2 of La Nación, 20 July 1926:
C.N.s 3366 and 3368 (see pages 218-220 of Chess Facts and Fables) presented parts of ‘Some Chess Players I Have Met’ by James Mortimer from pages 173-178 of the May 1905 BCM. On pages 293-297 of the August 1905 issue he contributed ‘Some More Chess Players I Have Met’.
Below is a profile of Mortimer by P.W. Sergeant on pages 155-160 of the April-September 1910 edition of the English Illustrated Magazine:
A number of points concerning Mortimer will be discussed in future items, including his year of birth (1832 or 1833?).
Chess Personalia by Jeremy Gaige (unpublished 1994 edition)
On page 155 of the English Illustrated Magazine, April-September 1910 (C.N. 11249), P.W. Sergeant wrote that James Mortimer was aged 78 at that time, having been born on 22 April 1832. A footnote on the same page stated that the information had been imparted by Mortimer himself. This would mean that when he died, in February 1911, he was aged 78.
Quite apart from secondary sources, primary ones offer much on Mortimer that is contradictory, and a non-exhaustive list follows.
Date of birth:
Date of death:
The BCM’s obituary was self-contradictory: if Mortimer was born on 22 April 1833 and died on 24 February 1911, he reached the age of 77, not 79. The oft-seen ‘aged 79’ cannot be correct in any eventuality.
In view of P.W. Sergeant’s comment about having corroboration from Mortimer himself, 22 April 1832 is by far the most likely birth-date, and particularly since it was also given on page 100 of the May 1911 American Chess Bulletin alongside this remark about a forthcoming international cable match:
The full American Chess Bulletin obituary:
In the final line, the date is incorrect; the last
Friday of the month was 24 February. The reference to
‘afternoon’ is contradicted by the above-mentioned
obituaries in the Daily Mail and The Times.
Page 7 of the Daily Mail, 27 February 1911 reported that Mortimer’s funeral had taken place in San Sebastián on 25 February:
Mate in three
James Mortimer gave this problem in his chess column in the Daily Mail, 12 December 1906, page 8. When reproducing it on page 195 of the Chess Amateur, April 1911, P.H. Williams called it a composition which Mortimer ‘was never tired of showing to anybody who would look at it’.
Another comment on Mortimer by Williams in the same Chess Amateur article:
James Mortimer’s introductory comments in his article ‘Some More Chess Players I Have Met’ on pages 291-297 of the August 1905 BCM:
Below is the problem as published in James Mortimer’s chess column in the Daily Mail, 12 December 1906, page 8:
Michael McDowell (Westcliff-on-sea, England) reports that it is the only composition by Mortimer in the WinChloe database, where the original source specified is the periodical Knowledge. That was in C.D. Locock’s column on page 99 of the 1 May 1891 edition:
The first of the reproductions listed in the WinChloe database is page 288 of the September 1891 International Chess Magazine. We note that Steinitz’s periodical gave as its source the Hereford Times, without a date.
From page 14 of Veliki šahovski turnirji 1851-1911 by Janez Stupica (Ljubljana, 2013):
C.N. 9069 drew attention to another misidentification in the book: on page 271 Kaiser was named as Chajes.
The start of an entry, by W.R. Hartston, on page 111 of The Encyclopedia of Chess edited by Harry Golombek (London, 1977):
The description ‘a gift of the gods to a languishing chess world’ is often said to have been written ‘once’ by someone, but what are the particulars?
The question was raised by Leonard Reitstein on page 197 of the July 1965 BCM, in D.J. Morgan’s Quotes and Queries column, but the only source offered was page 6 of the ninth edition of Modern Chess Openings by Walter Korn and John W. Collins (London, 1957):
Three snippets have been shown in The Evans Gambit, based on the existence of German-language websites which ascribe to Tartakower this observation on the Gambit: ‘Dieses blendende Angriffsspiel ist dafür erfunden worden, die Menschen zu dem Glauben zu veranlassen, dass die Schachkunst ein Geschenk der Götter ist’.
Die Hypermoderne Schachpartie by S. Tartakower (Vienna, 1924), page 173
La moderna partida de ajedrez by S. Tartakower, volume one (Buenos Aires, 1959), page 161
500 Master Games of Chess by S. Tartakower and J. du Mont (London, 1952), page 29.
Christian Sánchez (Rosario, Argentina) has forwarded two puzzling cuttings:
El Pueblo Vasco (San Sebastián), 25 February 1911, page 1
La Vanguardia (Barcelona), 25 February 1911, page 8
We can offer no explanation as to why the Daily Mail’s deceased chess correspondent was identified as James Henry Gerard. His widow was named by El Pueblo Vasco as Lydia Cowel; an Internet search for James Mortimer yields a number of pages which also mention Lydia Cowell in connection with theatrical activities.
The problems by Marín and Bernard were published on page 7 of the Norwich Mercury, 1 March 1905. The newspaper reported that Bernard’s won second prize ex aequo with this composition by A.F. Mackenzie:
Mate in three.
Another addition to Chess: The Greatest comes from a report by Miro Radojčić on his conversation with M. Najdorf at the 1968 Olympiad in Lugano. Najdorf asserted:
Source: Chess Life, January 1969, page 9.
From an entry by Wolfgang Heidenfeld on page 148 of The Encyclopedia of Chess edited by Harry Golombek (London, 1977):
For ease of reference, the score as given in the Encyclopedia and, for instance, on page 47 of Chess Review, February 1958: 1 d4 f5 2 g3 Nf6 3 Bg2 g6 4 Bg5 Bg7 5 Nc3 Nc6 6 Qd2 d6 7 h4 e6 8 O-O-O h6 9 Bf4 Bd7 10 e4 fxe4 11 Nxe4 Nd5 12 Ne2 Qe7 13 c4 Nb6 14 c5 dxc5 15 Bxc7 O-O 16 Bd6 Qf7 17 Bxf8 Rxf8 18 dxc5 Nd5 19 f4 Rd8 20 N2c3 Ndb4 21 Nd6 Qf8 22 Nxb7 Nd4 23 Nxd8 Bb5 24 Nxe6 Bd3 25 Bd5 Qf5 26 Nxd4+ Qxd5 27 Nc2 Bxc3 28 bxc3 Qxa2 29 cxb4 Resigns. Some sources have a slightly different order for the opening moves.
Information will be welcomed on where Lauterbach wrote about the game and whether his term was, as may be expected, ‘Die Unsterbliche Verlustpartie’. Heidenfeld mentioned Śliwa v Bronstein on page 271 of the September 1965 BCM, calling it the ‘immortal loss’.
From pages 6 and 17 of the 9 October 1927 issue of Carteles magazine:
Chess Review, February 1954, page 38
Page 200 of Chess in the Movies by Bob Basalla (Davenport, 2005) identified Robert Taylor’s opponent as Ava Gardner, instead of Maureen Swanson.
From page 126 of A Guide to Chess Endings by Max Euwe and David Hooper (London, 1959):
Not having seen the game-score in any database, we show its appearance, undated, on page 289 of the British Chess Federation’s Year Book 1949-1950 edited by J.H. van Meurs (Leeds, 1950):
1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 e6 3 d4 cxd4 4 Nxd4 Nf6 5 Nc3 d6 6 Bd3 a6 7 O-O b5 8 a3 Qc7 9 Qe1 Be7 10 b4 Bb7 11 Bb2 Nbd7 12 Kh1 Ne5 13 Be2 O-O 14 f4 Nc4 15 Bxc4 Qxc4 16 Rd1 Rfd8 17 Rf3 Rac8 18 Rh3 d5 19 exd5 Nxd5 20 Nxe6 Nxc3 21 Rxd8+ Bxd8 22 Nxd8 Rxd8 23 Rxc3 Qxf4 24 Rg3 f6 25 h3 Kf8 26 Bc1 Qe4 27 Be3 Kf7 28 Qe2 Qf5 29 Bc5 Re8 30 Qd3 Be4 31 Qd6 g5 32 h4 Qe5 33 Qd7+ Kg6 34 hxg5 Qxg3 35 Qxe8+ Kf5 36 Qc8+ Kxg5 37 Qg8+ Kh4 38 Qxg3+ Kxg3 39 Bd6+ Kf2 40 Bc5+ Kf1 41 Kh2 Bxg2 42 Kg3 Be4 43 c3 Ke2 44 Bd4 f5 45 Be5 Kd3 46 Kf4 Kc4 47 Kg5 Kb3 48 Kh6 Kxa3 49 Kxh7 f4+ 50 Kh6 f3 51 Bd4 Kb3 52 Kg5 Kc4 53 Kf4 a5 and wins.
Fabrizio Zavatarelli (Milan, Italy) draws attention to this excerpt from the ninth edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, on page 593, with respect to The Knight Challenge:
The article on chess, published in the mid-1870s, was signed ‘W.N.P.’, i.e. William Norwood Potter. His obituary on page 180 of the April 1895 BCM called it ‘masterly’; page 226 of the April 1895 Chess Monthly stated that Potter edited the article ‘together with Steinitz and Zukertort’.
C.N. 11256 showed that two Spanish newspapers dated 25 September 1911 mysteriously referred to James Mortimer as ‘Mr James Henry Gerard’.
Javier Asturiano Molina (Murcia, Spain) reports that he has found Mortimer’s death certificate, dated 24 February 1911, in the Registro Civil of San Sebastián:
The certificate was signed by the juez municipal the same day (‘á las diez y seis del día veinticuatro de Febrero de mil novecientos once’).
First, two extracts from The Human Side of Chess by Fred Reinfeld (London, 1953):
From a review of Reinfeld’s book on page 3 of CHESS, October 1953:
The specific remark by Morphy about Boden being ‘undoubtedly the strongest English player of the present day’ was not made ‘promptly’ by Morphy after his arrival in England in June 1858. He wrote it in his New York Ledger column of 31 March 1860 in notes to a McDonnell v Labourdonnais game (which had begun 1 e4 e5 2 Bc4 Nf6 3 d4):
Also concerning Boden, below is a comment by F.M. Edge on page 73 of his book on Morphy (New York, 1859):
The entire 1859 banquet story involving Colonel Mead was dismissed by David Lawson on pages 213-214 of his 1976 monograph on Morphy: ‘No such incident occurred.’ On page 174 Lawson commented regarding The Human Side of Chess: ‘Reinfeld is frequently in error in his facts and assessments.’
Carteles, August 1919, page 58
Carteles, August 1919, page 59
September 1919, page 36
Chess Notes Archives
Copyright: Edward Winter. All rights reserved.